In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer.
One of the important elements of today world is the unimaginable amount of stress it imposes on people. Humans tend to resort to unhealthy to combat their stress, smoking being one among them. One of the important aspects of smoking which people do not seem to concur is to whether or not smoking should be allowed in public places. Turning a blind eye toward those who agree or repudiate the contention, I tend to learn towards the idea that, public smoking should be discouraged and penalized.
Among a plentitude of reasons which smoking imposes, health hazards should be looked into as an important factor. Smoking leads to severe diseases and disorders like bronchitis, asthma and lung carcinoma. To make matters worse, smoking not only punishes the smokers but also the people surrounding them. To elucidate on, there have been multiple instances of colleagues, friends and spouses of smokers being affected by the said diseases. Preventing smoking in public places, thus leads to better public health.
Smoking has a bad influence on children. A public smoker negatively influences children around him. A child becomes inquisitive about cigarettes. Unaware of the consequences, teens may have the chances of resorting to unhealthy use of tobacco. To reduce such mis-happenings, public smoking should be avoided.
It is necessary to abide by the social rules. These rules have been imposed on to the public to promote co-existence. Meticulously following these social rules is necessary for the public welfare. Not smoking in public is one among them. When an imbalance is created in the ecosystem, it leads to severe destruction. Although banning smoking causes financial losses for distributors and manufacturers, we have to think from a broader perspective of public welfare. Thus, I reiterate that smoking must be banned in public. Public smokers should be punished and penalized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | noobmaster69 | 83 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | hasan123456 | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | spvpr | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | spvpr | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | mmm3 | 68 | view |
- For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 76
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 60
- For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 78
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 60
- Advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and the telephone have changed the way nations intercat with each other in a global society. Choose another technological innovation that you think is important. Give specific reasons for your 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, may, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29139072848 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8522526082 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.443471464 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6363636364 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7272727273 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.45110844103 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171292456261 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549561745319 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04299989336 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107357427852 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214397672617 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.