In countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
In recent years, the lack of employment has been gaining a great deal attention in certain countries particularly those are developing. Most importantly, the issue has become a bone of contention among the critics regarding how it can be resolved by removing the obligation of education after certain level. While some people consider, after entry level, the provision of education should be relaxed, however, I strongly disagree with it suggesting that it must remain mandatory to continue study till high school level.
To begin with, in case of competitive job market where even educated persons remain unemployed, putting emphasis on education is apparently useless. However, the real fact is for earning money or for holding the steering wheel of a disrupted economy, fifth-grade learning is not enough. Therefore, for getting a minimum level of maturity, at least mid-level schooling with customized curriculum should be mandatory. Moreover, the children who are at the initial level of the learning age, are also physically and mentally not enough fit yet to fight the future battle. Thus, if they drop out of the school after class five, they will be physically and mentally challenged which is not at all good for the future of the country. Furthermore, if anyone talks about entrepreneurship or vocational training, that can not be started simply after primary school. For this reason, many developing countries, Bangladesh and India for instance, start engaging with trade-based after 8th-grade. This approach is more optimized considering the output as well as feasibility.
Despite the issue of immaturity, some countries might consider compulsory education till primary school is enough for making money. To them, it becomes a question of survival and presumably, there is no alternative way other than earning minimum wage. However, this approach may initiate a potential scope for child labor and undoubtedly endangering the future of the kids of these days.
To conclude, relaxing the obligation of education at the childhood age may initially bring some dollars to the home end of the day, but it will make the future of the kids vulnerable to a vicious cycle of poverty. Therefore, the government of those countries must consider high school level as the minimum requirements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | 1aja | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Bhawna Sharma | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | learnafren | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | vikash | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | itsshuvro | 89 | view |
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter :1) Say why he/she would not enjoy going to college.2) Ex 58
- Online, people write opinions and reviews of services. Is it a good thing or bad thing.? 56
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter :1) Say why he/she would not enjoy going to college.2) Ex 73
- Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution the government should increase tax on petrol gasoline Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Recommendation letter 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33241758242 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89673930467 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5665733096 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3125 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176089198846 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594013124365 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594001201689 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110839191039 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168684604137 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.