Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Science has revolutionized the way humans interact with the world. Physics has allowed people to take advantage of elements such as wind and water to generate electricity. Biology and medicine have vastly improved the quality and longevity of human lives. While scientific discoveries have given us a better understanding of the world around us, it has simultaneously opened our eyes to the true complexity and constraints of our current understandings. Niche scientific fields within physics--such as astronomy and theoretical physics--have even the most renowned physicists scratching their heads. As we answer more scientific question, inevitably more will pop up--this does not mean scientists should give up. It's in human nature to embrace a challenge.
The ancient Greeks used to believe that the weather was based upon the moods of their gods. A thunderstorm was said to be caused by the wrath of Zeus--the god of the skies. After centuries of scientific discoveries and progress, however, humans were able to send up satellite technologies into space and use technical tools such as barometers to better understand and predict the weather. A thunderstorm was no longer an unpredictable even, born out of the anger of a god, but the result of a predictable environmental factors. While ancient civilizations believed that deathly plagues were a result of the god's displeasure with humans, modern medicine has proven otherwise. The discovery of antibiotics and vaccination has vastly transformed the way humans look at disease and illnesses. Science has unequivocally given us a better understanding of fields such as meteorology and medicine--especially in comparison with our human ancestors.
However, our scientific progress has come accompanied with a whole host of new scientific questions. The day's where Newtonian physics were first discovered were much simpler than where physicists are at now. The centuries following that era have come concomitant with complex issues such as quantum mechanics, dark energy, and dark matter. Chemistry has revealed to us that our earlier understanding of an atomic structure, a core of protons and neutrons surrounded by concentric orbits of electrons, was much more complex and nuanced than chemists could've once imagined. It has become somewhat paradoxical that the more knowledge human civilizations acquire, the more knowledge there becomes to yet be discovered.
Science has transformed the way humans perceive the world. Phenomena that were once mysterious and unpredictable have become either predictable or 'to be solved.' Science has granted us the knowledge that while the world is incredibly complex, much more so than our ignorantly blissful ancestors could've ever imagined, there is an answer to everything—it just needs to be found. It is difficult to say whether we've accumulated more questions or answers through our scientific discoveries--it is difficult to quantify. But one thing of certain, regardless of the number of new questions scientific discoveries bring up, it is in human nature to keep striving towards the answers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | salamikehinde | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Cursed God | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | shahryar2222 | 54 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | gbhardwa | 33 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 83
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from thosewhose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 66
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'factor'?
Suggestion: factor
...e result of a predictable environmental factors. While ancient civilizations believed t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gods'' or 'god's'?
Suggestion: gods'; god's
...at deathly plagues were a result of the gods displeasure with humans, modern medicin...
^^^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
...e found. It is difficult to say whether weve accumulated more questions or answers t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2631.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51572327044 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24123117172 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2306786691 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04166666667 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294816475271 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719508449213 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770278896367 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181804543774 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489310106134 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.