Many people believe that social networking sites ( such as Facebook ) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Social networking sites, for instance Facebook, are thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on an individual person and society as well. In my opinion, I agree that people are affecting badly both mentally and physically by these networking sites consequently, damaging society as well.
To begin, social networking sites for example Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram etc., profoundly affecting mental and physical health of an individual person. In other words, people have access to these sites on their mobiles everywhere and spend an enormous amount of time of their life instead of doing some physical task that affect their health overall. Furthermore, it is dangerous to give all personal details online as it could be hacked and miss-used by some criminal minded people. To illustrate, people are sharing some of their personal information with strangers online that could be used for some wrong purpose.
Another point to consider is that society and social values are affecting adversely by these networking sites as people spending too much time on online networking of friends instead of face to face social meeting with friends and family. To give an example, the relationship of family members are adversely affected by these sites because people keep themselves busy on checking these sites.
Finally, adverse effect of social networking sites on individual and society, consequently, could affect the national progress overall. Healthy individual and interactive society could lead the nation in a positive direction towards future progress.
In conclusion, from health and security point of view, social networking sites are too dangerous for human well being and for society as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | satnam100 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | wardiati | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | fadhiahelbas | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | acr | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-16 | lusinelusine | 78 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 73
- There is no future for public transport, because travelling by car is so much more convenient.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites ( such as Facebook ) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages ? 84
- Nowadays the use of social media such as facebook twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one on one conversation Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on individual and society, consequently, could affect the national progress overa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47940074906 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70710097432 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513108614232 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3687140055 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22310834484 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969989552185 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624616941701 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135863576907 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567233579331 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.