whether Whitehead was the first person to fly an airplane
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in whether Whitehead was the first person to fly an airplane. First of all, the reading says that no photo were take to proof that he made the flight. however, the listening argues that photographs were not well develop during that time. Since the photo has a poor quality and it is blurry, it is hard for people to see. Besides, Whitehead flew very early in the morning, so people cannot see it clearly because the light were not very bright. Indeed, since the photo had poor quality and the light is dark, people should not use these photo as an evidence.
In addition, the reading suggests that Whitehead's airplane could not make it really take off and fly because of the design. On the other hand, the listening asserts that this hypothesis is incorrect. Many publics know the design of Whitehead's airplane, so some people had made it and test it again, and the result is the airplane design by Whitehead can actually fly in a extremely safe way. In other words, people had test and show the airplane design of Whitehead actually work. Therefore, this hypothesis is not likely to be the explanation.
Last but not least, the reading implies that other airplane company refuse to use Whitehead's engine because his engine has a poor quality so it is impossible for him to fly the plane. However, the listening indicates that the problem of other company's airplane is the design does not match with Whitehead's engine. Moreover, the reason why other companies end up buying Whitehead's engine is because it has a high quality. To say it differently, if Whitehead's engine has a high quality, he can definitely use it and make a successful flight.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 60 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | Steven Huang | 73 | view |
- Sinosauroteryx 73
- higher taxes 71
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement The way a person dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Antlers 73
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...ll, the reading says that no photo were take to proof that he made the flight. howev...
^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... take to proof that he made the flight. however, the listening argues that photographs ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...design by Whitehead can actually fly in a extremely safe way. In other words, peo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, in addition, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49762487614 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476351351351 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0785784585 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3086808884 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969421514609 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124626548714 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183628183657 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335828306272 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.