Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sportspeople are too high, while others argue that sports salaries are fair.
There are many people believing that the salaries of athletes are too high, whereas other individuals suppose that these people deserve to have these salary level. I would argued that high wages are suitable for the professional sportspeople.
It is certainly true that sports professionals are able to earn a lot of money, even though they do not provide any vital service. For example, football players get an enormous salaries by simply kicking a ball. Moreover, all the people still live happily without the professional players who do not have any impact on people lives. Meanwhile, there are many nurses or teachers who absolutely do the great things to the world receive a much lower salaries than the sportspeople. This may lead to an unfair situation.
On the other hand, It is reasonable that the excellent athletes are paid a lot of money. For the most part, sports industry is recognised as a multi-million-pound industry in which there is a large audience of sports fans are willing to pay for watching the match and developing sport industry. Furthermore, it take a considerable time to become a professional player. For instance, the athletes start learning their sports when they were a child, these people have to give up on many precious things such as staying together with family for attending gifted sports school, It is really hard to live independently when they are too young. Besides that, playing sports is risk of accidents, they always encounter with injuries which can destroy their career in the rest of their life. Additionally, It also takes a lot of money to treat.
For reasons mentioned above, It seems to me that the professional sportsperson totally deserve to get high salaries because of their effort.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-14 | minpearl | 96 | view |
2019-01-20 | bminhanh01 | 67 | view |
2017-05-12 | Saeed2 | 73 | view |
2017-01-29 | mabick_1527 | 97 | view |
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- The money spent by government on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals.To what extend do you argee or disagree. 78
- Early technological developments helped ordinary people changed their lives more than recent developments To what extend do you agree or disagree 93
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in diffirent countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development? 67
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can government make urban life better to everyone. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this salary' or 'these salaries'?
Suggestion: this salary; these salaries
...ppose that these people deserve to have these salary level. I would argued that high wages a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'argue'
Suggestion: argue
...rve to have these salary level. I would argued that high wages are suitable for the pr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...eloping sport industry. Furthermore, it take a considerable time to become a profess...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02068965517 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85027899838 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3251394443 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291620851927 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089897221195 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804399279366 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196333670574 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107702111036 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.