In recent years, the family structure has changed as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think this changes are positive or negative?
It is undoubted that there are many differences between the modern life and the life in decades before. One of them is the change of family structure as well as family roles. In my opinion, these changes are positive progress.
Firstly, a few extreme changes could be observed in families today. The most obvious one is the decreased size of a family in society. In Vietnam, for example, the traditional family are the extended families, all the members consist of grandparents, parents, children or grandchildren all living under the same roof. In recent years, it has been transformed into the nuclear families with only parents and children. This positive trend means that the conflict between the older and the younger could be avoided. Moreover, single parents can look after their children by themselves and make them stronger as well as more independent.
Secondly, there is also a significant change in terms of the roles of the father and the mother in a family. A few decades ago, the men kept the main providers while the women were the care givers. The responsibilities for all expenditure in family were on the shoulder of fathers. It seemed that the finance was unstable. Nowadays, men and women take the similar role in family. Both parents not only could be the breadwinners but also share household duties. For instance, the women can go out to work and they are able to earn plenty of money to improve financial condition of family. In addition, they also have opportunities to pursue their education and profession. It is true that there are many women play vital roles of large companies and give their qualify for developed society. Meanwhile, modern husbands tend to stay at home parent to look after children and housework. This lead to equal treatment and respect to women.
In conclusion, the change of family structure as well as family roles are positive trends. They are suitable with the modern life, the liberty of any people is protected, people can do what they like and what they are good at. Both men and women take part in social work related and be treated equally.
- In the future, we will have more and more leisure time as machines replace many of the tasks we do at home and at work. Discuss the benefits this will bring and also the problems it will cause. 67
- Trees are essential for the existence of the human race as they provide the oxygen that we need to survice. Yet, daily all around the globe large areas of woodland are being detroyed. Many people feel that they as individuals can do nothing and that only 61
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think this changes are positive or negative 58
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is becoming more and more difficult to escape the influence of the media on our lives Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living in a media rich society 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily in society. In Vietnam, for example, the traditional family are the extended ...
^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...en by themselves and make them stronger as well as more independent. Secondly, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88022284123 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61161633436 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526462395543 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5862308783 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1739130435 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6086956522 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5652173913 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291049654251 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858243893576 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132013762579 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213676944832 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105847459645 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.