The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
he given pie charts illustrate the percentage of pupils at an England university capable of speaking an extra language other than English during the years 2000 and 2010.
We can see that Spanish was the most sought language among the university students. All the percentages of students speaking an additional language increased in general, apart from French during the timeline. German language saw no change in popularity over the period.
The percentage of students speaking one other language and two extra languages rose by 5 percent each to 20 percent and 15 percent respectively. While Spanish-speaking students rose by 5 percent from 30 percent in 2000 to 35 percent in 2010, French language saw a decreasing trend by falling from 15 percent in 2000 to 10 percent in 2010. Students speaking German as an additional language remained constant at 10 percent.
So, to conclude, we can say that Spanish was the top spoken extra language and students of the university increased their other language speaking competencies in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevantexamples from yo 89
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period. 67
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he given pie charts illustrate the percent...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'gave'?
Suggestion: gave
he given pie charts illustrate the percentage of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, apart from, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22619047619 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89290613323 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.573429759 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300323588238 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142975824253 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692649501496 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191254527633 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526938631213 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.