Do you agree or disagree; all students should be required to take classes outside of their major field of study?
Planet Earth is a huge network connecting all the living beings to the physical world. Regarding that life iteration, we should start learning the causes and effects of our actions seeing the big picture. The future needs an innovative way of thinking to attend the necessities of the evolution, and due to this, the study must be developed and recreated. A university which wants to prepare their students to their career, will take them not only out the classroom, but outside their specific area of knowledge.
Amidst a Cartesian view of the world, a mechanical clock is often used as the model for the scientific method. Briefly, each small thing can be separated and analyzed, and then, makes up the big clock of planet Earth. Amazingly, it could explain many questions about the environment that surround us. The humanity now understand the atom, enters the quantum field and propitiate their advancement. Joyfully the world celebrates the advancements of science, a new lifestyle it is being created, which is with no doubt more comfortable.
Hence, the success of Descartes vision goes wide-spread, because of this, there was cons and they are really dangerous. Therefore, was not noticed the damage of pollution in global scale, and now are several studies about many simple actions and their general effect in long and short-term. Excess is a poison to human mind, even more, is a drug, addictive. Everything that we learn that is good and for instance works, we take it as irrefutable truth with no collateral damages. A good question is when we are going to learn before being affected by our own creations. These essays can only be understood by watching how the network is unstable and how it tries to balance, in other words, is required interdisciplinarity.
An educational system, which integrates the process of human evolution, should disseminate the specific research for each major field, plus the knowledge of how their areas affects another disciplines and vice versa. All the background must be granted for the theoretical and practical learning, in fact, it should be used for reaching the estimated sustainable future.
A résumé for this elaborated answer is that interdisciplinarity is not an “if” but a “must” for the next generations of professionals. Our planet demands a righteous care and only understanding the relations present on the big network that he is we can do that. Looking closely is very helpful but is not the only look needed, so we as citizens and professionals in any area, should open our eyes to what we really know about we are doing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | ueslenbresolin | 90 | view |
| 2019-02-01 | ueslenbresolin | 86 | view |
| 2016-06-02 | sapkota21 | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree; all students should be required to take classes outside of their major field of study? 86
- Many democratic countries report low voter turnout in people aged 18-25. Why do you think many young people are not voting? 3
- Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iplinarity is not an 'if' but a 'must' for the next generatio...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, hence, if, look, really, regarding, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06960556845 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00859104773 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580046403712 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4205985673 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201286189638 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504221015389 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475708167535 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110152572269 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667911984071 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.