As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The past few centuries has seen an incredible rise in new inventions and tools. While many of these inventions has improved the standards of living for humans and made their lives easier, this rise in technology has not come without serious repercussions. With the advent of new technological tools, the ability for humans to think for themselves and accomplish what their ancestors could in the past without such tools has decreased significantly.
For example, the decrease in humans' ability to truly understand math has decreased with the invention and subsequent enhancements of calculators. Students have come to rely heavily on calculators for simple arithmetic calculations. While students may be forced to not use calculators for certain tests, they are no longer enthusiastic about trying to perform arithmetic operations without a calculator when given the choice to do so. As a result, people no longer think much about numbers and try to a develop a proper number sense. If such people know any mental math tricks, it is simply because someone else told them these tricks. It is rare for a person to try to figure out tricks like doubling and halving on their own. Likewise, the same can be said regarding the use of graphing calculators for graphing equations. How often can a student mentally figure out what y = |x^2 + 3| may look like without a calculator or computer program such as Wolfram Alpha? Very few indeed. No one tries to figure these things out anymore now that a computer or machine can do it for them. Students have lost their ability and desire to be creative in math. Thus, calculators have caused humans to stop trying to understand math at a much deeper level since it is no longer required of them to do so.
In addition to the field of mathematics, the decreasing ability for humans to think for themselves is also very prevalent in the medical industry. Now that blood tests, MRI scans, CT scans, and a whole other slew of testing mechanisms have been developed, doctors have come to rely more and more on the results of such tests and less on their own abilities. In places such as Pakistan and South Korea, it is now very difficult for a patient to find a doctor who can clinically diagnose which disease the patient is suffering from. In medical colleges and universities, students are increasily taught how to use new medical inventions instead of being taught how to rely on their own senses and deductive abilities. As a result, going to see a doctor has also become extravagantly expensive since a patient is forced to first perform numerous tests before the doctor is willing to even speak with the patient. Yet, how accurate are all these tests in the first place? A loose wire in an ECG machine could indicate a patient has died when they may still be breathing. A mix of up blood vials could mistakenly indicate that one patient is perfectly healthy while another may have Hepatitis C instead of vice versa. In addition to human errors in operating medical inventions, a machine can at any moment malfunction. Even then, a doctor is still more likely to rely on technology than to step in and figure out or double check the situation at hand. Therefore, it is quite clear that doctors are also losing the ability to diagnose a patient's problems without relying heavily on technology.
On the other hand, there is still a field in which humans are actually becoming more innovative and creative. This is the field of developing technology itself. Such humans, when faced with adversity, have become very contemplative and creative in attempting to dissect their problems and figure out how to make a tool that may help them succeed in accomplishing their goals. For instance, a simple villager was able to create a claw like machine to help pick coconuts off of high palm trees in order to avoid the dangers of climbing these trees and possibly falling down in the process. However, very few people are still trying to solve their problems by coming up with their own solutions or by making their own tools. The vast majority of humans just scavenge and purchase a machine to solve their problems for them, thus using much less brain power in the process.
Overall, the ability for humans to think for themselves is indeed declining with the advent of new technologies. This is especially evident in the fields of mathematics and medicine. If the tools such people used were suddenly taken away, they would struggle immensely. Humans need to learn not only how to use new technology, but also how to not use technology in order to preserve their ability to think.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ger think much about numbers and try to a develop a proper number sense. If such people k...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, likewise, look, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 123.0 58.6224719101 210% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3830.0 2235.4752809 171% => OK
No of words: 792.0 442.535393258 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83585858586 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30495000532 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65728389056 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 352.0 215.323595506 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1213.2 704.065955056 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3552566402 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.388888889 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206236241085 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560560800434 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589108184381 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134053333669 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260472687214 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.