Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Every creäture on the earth helps the nature in with their own capacities. Today the science develops technologies to make humans life comfortable but it destroy other creäture as well as the forest life. I am agreeing with statement society should make efforts to save endangered species not only the extinction is the result of human activities but also tries to save them from other dangers.
Furthermore, let’s start with the human activities which cause danger to other species such as deforestation, industrialization, and increase in transportation, change natural way of river and size of mountain and so on. In our city the small river called Kahana was converted to sewage and because of it the aquatic animals extinct from our city. One more example that peacock found in our area very easily but now not a single peacock seen in same area because of construction of houses. There are so many examples which explain that human had interfered with the nature and harm to natural species.
Moreover, every species play important role on the land and all of them make balance in ecosystem. As the science develops in every area then we should help the endangered species also. The climatic changes also affect the species such as this year the polar temperature dropped up to 70 degree Celsius which will defiantly affect polar bears. We take help from scientific inventions to adjust with the climatic changes and survive in too clod as well as with too hot atmosphere. So we should help the endangered species also to survive with the climatic situations.
Additionally, we use animals for leather, medicines, decorative products, meat, milk, and earn money by hunting them so we should do something to save endangered species. We should not be very selfish to take benefits from animals and let them go to finish. We should make shelter for endangered species according to their adaptation and save their species because all species are useful. For example, Goriya is a bird found in local area of India but now it is about to extinct due to increase in population and now to save Goriya people started to hang earthen pots for water and grains for the Goriya. So we should do something to save the endangered species to save our natural beauty and environmental balance.
Conclusively, the society should make efforts to save endangered species to save our environment as well as balance our ecosystem. We should not make efforts to save species which become extinct due to human activities but also make positive efforts to help to save from other activities also.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed damaged by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places Why do you think people visit museums Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or m 16
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destroys'?
Suggestion: destroys
... to make humans life comfortable but it destroy other creäture as well as the forest li...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... creäture as well as the forest life. I am agreeing with statement society should make effo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... all of them make balance in ecosystem. As the science develops in every area then...
^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...n we should help the endangered species also. The climatic changes also affect the s...
^^^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s to help to save from other activities also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71867627809 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44930875576 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9388817936 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.842105263 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8421052632 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282468145558 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100904927236 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847629918015 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178657773518 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771105557185 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.