The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The Table above gives information about the capacity of oil production of 6 major oil producers in the middle east region from 1990 to 2010. in this period an overall trend of production was upward for all countries except Qatar which shows almost a flat trend with small fluctuations.
Saudi Arabia has produced most between these countries, in 1990 its capacity was 8 million barrels per day which increased by almost 6 million to reach 14 million barrels in 2010. Interestingly Iran, Iraq, Kuwait and UAE output amount was almost identical from 2 million barrels per day in 1990 to 4 in 2010. The sharpest increase in production trend belongs to Iran which jumped from 2.5 million in 1990 to roughly 4 million barrels per day and then has grown slowly to a little more than 4 million.
Qatar had the lowest oil production volume estimation. in 1990 it only produced less than one million in 1990. However, ten years later production has increased but remained below 1 million barrels and this trend continued until 2010.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-05 | lehonganh | 78 | view |
2019-02-08 | quantdeveloper | 80 | view |
2018-12-21 | Eric Liu | 67 | view |
2017-10-14 | vuthuy125 | 61 | view |
2017-07-21 | sonchip96hb | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e middle east region from 1990 to 2010. in this period an overall trend of product...
^^
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...owest oil production volume estimation. in 1990 it only produced less than one mil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52423685383 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585227272727 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1533402847 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167761448464 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875132785011 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485724197174 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1358458531 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578923690755 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.