The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The two maps below portray road access to a City Hospital in two separate years 2007 and 2010.
As can be seen, manifold changes happened over the period under review.
According to the 2007 map surrounding by Road Ring and there were Hospital Road and City Road all of which remained stable from 2007 to 2010.
In the map of 2007, there was a shared car park for both staff and public on the east side of Hospital Road which had been converted to two separate car parks by 2010.
The public car park had been located to the east of City Hospital and staff car park stayed at the previous place beside the Hospital Road.
The other feature changing in the 2010 map in comparison to the map of 2007 was Bus Station. In 2007 there were six Bus Stops beside Hospital Road which had been emerged to one Bus Station by 2010.
By 2010, two roundabouts had been constructed connecting Hospital Road with City Road from south and Ring Road from north. In addition, there were two ways from Bus Station to these two roundabouts.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding to the 2007 map surrounding by Road Ring and there were Hospital Road and Ci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55080213904 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16390623771 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465240641711 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.89688146 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528169834718 0.215688989381 245% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255185327799 0.103423049105 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194901191567 0.0843802449381 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29064082361 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207758669913 0.0819641961636 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.