Many filmmakers made movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch movie first. What do you think?
It is increasingly common that more and more filmmakers base on books to make their films. For the question that what people will choose to do primarily, different people’s views vary from on to another. Personally, I think watching movies before reading books will be a better choice.
Although, some people will choose the opposite one since they think books will give them more details so that they are able to have a further understanding of the stories when they watch the movies specifically based on the books. Plus, one of the reasons why they think so is they find it boring read the books after watching the movies. I think watching movies before reading the book definitely has more advantages over the opposite one.
First of all, movies can be considered to be the abstracts of books so that people can read the related books without any barrier. I am convinced movies can offer people something like the actions of actors including what they do in the movies and their expressions on their faces which can help explain what the movies are about. As a result, people can read the books which are based by the movies much more clearly. In addition, distinct plots provided by movies as videos can make audiences more familiar with the stories. It is obvious that videos are more vivid. It furnishes a variety of aspects towards the background tales in form of video to people who like films. Consequently, viewers may be able to comprehend the stories more deeply. Moreover, films are the combinations of groups’ work while books are made by one individual that blockbusters can make appreciators more interested in plots so that they will be more motivated to read books. So I do believe that films are made more elaborately than those books that it can be thought as stimulation for purchasers of film tickets to read correlative books.
All in all, as the reasons above, watching movies before reading books will certainly be my preference. Furthermore, I recommend those filmmakers to make films based on books more related to the books. That will make the films well accepted. They have to profoundly realize that stories from books are the reason people see the films.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-17 | amir_pdn | 68 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | bijan54 | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | elhamzafsharian | 70 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Bobby-Shi02 | 60 | view |
| 2017-11-12 | rashin | 87 | view |
- TPO 30 Integrated Writing 76
- 15. A primary (elementary) school is considering increasing the amount of time it spends educating its young students about technology (for example, computers). To do so, it would decrease the amount of time it spends educating the students about music an 71
- Recently some students need to arrive at school at early in the morning. Some people think that starting school day early is a good approach to support learning, while other people think that starting school day at the later time is a good approach to sup 73
- 4. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The university will spend money on dormitory to improve the life quality of students, which of the following do you think is the best way? 1. Providing a room for quiet study;2. Building an exercis 71
- Which one do you think is the most important factor for a student to success at college or university 1 Tutors in university 2 The encouragement from family and friends 3 High quality education from high school 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are the reason people see the films.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, i think, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85638297872 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56768382523 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438829787234 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5417739511 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407698332264 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140677544724 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875719906419 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290292380651 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350283207316 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.