The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate.
The pie chart illustrates data on the result of boys and girls cultural and leisure activities.
As it observed, boys preferred playing basketball while girls liked dancing. In addition, both genders enjoyed listening to music and playing computer games.
Playing computer games is the most popular activities and is followed by playing basketball at 34% and 26% respectively. 17% of boys preferred soccer, while the figure for skateboarding at 11%. Listening to music and reading is the least preferable activities among boys, chosen by only 10% and 2% respectively.
Turning to the second chart, the most preferred activities of the girls is dancing, being 27% of total. In contrast to the boys, reading is chosen by more than a fifth of girls. The number of girls who chose computer games is 16% and is closely followed by the figure for netball at 15%. Gymnastics and listening to music, two of the least favored activities, represents 11% and 10% respectively.
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 61
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is entertaining Others say that films should have educational value Discuss both view and give your opinion 63
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods 11
- The maps below give information about a school site in 2004 and the planning of the same school in 2010 70
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11949685535 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85992761271 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.7090372409 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123965544278 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558677200152 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649574688112 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101681647646 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749802775037 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.