Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV há bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted on the media. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In modern days, crime is one of the main subjects of most media channels. To a certain extent, I agree that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV has bad influences in many ways so that this kind of information should be restricted on the media.
Firstly, as a common reader, it seemed to me that I have always been fallen in fear when reading about violent and bad news. In fact, mass media can reach to people of every age, for that reason, children are easily directly affected. This may lead to fear and some undesirable consequences, such as: being always live in bad feelings, imitating what law-breakers did, even being obsessed because of lacking life-experience and being unstable in psychology. Furthermore, it results in the feeling of insecurity among the public.
Secondly, although the purpose of warning people about many kinds bad situation caused by law-breakers, it also causes the increasing in the number of people committing crime due to the methods from TV programmes and newspaper stories about crimes. By contrast, if we restrict strictly the cause to know crime, we can cut the rate of people who break law by access to criminal skills and even the police’s detective ways from media channels.
Granted, sensational stories are more likely to attract huge readers or viewers because of satisfying people’s curiosity and adding variety to choices, in my opinion, the overwhelming bad effects have overshadowed any benefit.
In conclusion, detailed criminal description should be restricted by strict regulations to limit such broadcasting. In order to do that successfully, government and relevant organizations should co-operate for guaranteeing healthier circumstances
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | leuyen0805 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in Australia in 1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevantFamily type 56
- The graph below shows average obesity rates in the USA according to gender from 2000 to 2008 100
- The graph below shows average obesity rates in the USA according to gender from 2000 to 2008
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspaper and TV há bad influences, so this kind of information should be restricted on the media. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- The following graph shows the production of electricity according to source in France between 1985 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37867647059 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10623039703 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632352941176 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.016323517 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359567770691 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119492348911 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141311484466 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18532606165 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127953003852 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.