Subjects such as Art, Sport and Music are being dropped from the school curriculum for subjects such as Information Technology. Many students suffer as a result of these changes.
To what extent would you support or reject the idea of moving these subjects from school curriculum?
In recent years, many schools have included latest and technology related subjects while dropped traditional subjects from the school syllabus. Whether old subjects should be replaced by modern one is a matter of great debate and I believe it is a difficult question to answer and different schools should adopt different solutions.
Some believe that traditional subjects should be retained as part of the school curriculum as they have great values for the students. According to their arguments, school education is not merely a process to ensure a future job. This is rather a broader aspect and to build an enlightened future generation, we need more cultural and arts-related subjects than technical ones.
Another group of people believe that technical subjects are more important than arts and sports subjects as they not only ensure better learning for students but also guarantee jobs in the future. From a more practical point of view, technical knowledge is more important in life and this is why many people and guardians support the change in the school curriculum.
The changes in school curriculum often create some difficulties to the students and teachers but if effective measures are taken, that should not be a big dilemma. Sometimes the change comes all of a sudden and learners do not have a clue what to do. The school authorities, in this case, should play an important role to support the learners.
I personally believe that school curriculum should be changed from time to time to make it more suitable to the latest trend. This, however, does not mean that we drop cultural and arts-related subjects from our school. While place for the new subjects should be made, old and important subjects should also be part of the national curriculum.
In conclusion, school curriculum is a very sensitive issue and that should be very carefully planned. Modern subjects should be introduced, no doubt, but this should not make the traditional and old subjects less important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
- As countries have developed there has been a trend towards smaller family sizes. Why does this happen? How does this affect society? 73
- Some practical skills such as money management should be taught in high school. 61
- Nowadays more people get married to someone of a different culture than they ever did.Why is this happening? Discuss both benefits and demerits of this trend. 73
- It is important that we maintain and protect the beautiful building of the past, even if it is expensive for countries to do so.Do you agree with this statement? 73
- The only way to cut the crime rate is building more prisons and make prison sentences longer 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'time to'.
Suggestion: time to
...chool curriculum should be changed from time to time to make it more suitable to the latest tre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso be part of the national curriculum. In conclusion, school curriculum is a ve...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15902140673 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71342930866 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483180428135 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4512538072 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.466666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28683784314 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113456880636 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640716594803 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171512657089 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501970983707 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.