Schools always collect information about teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful？ 1. to evaluate teachers' performance by students. 2. to evaluate teachers' performance by teachers? Why？ Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
With the development of modern society and social progress, teachers no longer are the most important character in school, on the contrary, students become more and more paramount because their opinion can reflect the teaches performance.
there are some people argue that school should evaluate teacher’s performance according to students’ assumptions; however, others think that teachers should give opinions to each other. In my opinion, I am in favor of second thought. the reasons I will explain below.
First of all, most pupils will vote for the teachers who they like and then this reward becomes meaningless. Nonetheless, the meaning of this reward is to find the effective teacher who enables to make students specialize in studying rather than to find a teacher who is liked the most. if students vote a teacher they like, there will be a profusion of teachers' effort wasted. A typical example is that when I was in the elementary school, this school wanted to find the most popular teacher by thinking that the reason why students they like him so much is due to effective performance and wanted to make all teachers imitate his teaching style. Whereas, the true reason this teacher was so popular is that he did not focus on teaching students about the subject but he just left those students to sleep and to do their own thing. Therefore, those students thought he was a good teacher since he did not restrict students behavior.
Secondly, it is beneficial for the school to make tutors evaluate each other. That is to say that teachers have mature thought and have considerable expertise, they can distinguish what will favor the students. For example, every month, my college will find the best teacher in this school according to their evaluation and discussion. The best one will share his own experience with other teachers, therefore, all the teachers will become better and give students more auspicious information and knowledge.
There is no denying that students’ opinions are important as well which can improve the teachers' motivation, thus they can have more energy to mentor their students. however, the opinions given by students do not have to be used to vote. since the teacher who gets the less number of votes will feel frustrated and lose their confidence and impetus in teaching, leading to the loss of talents.
to sum up, due to above-mentioned reasons, which can correlate with each other to generate a new whole and become more convincing, we may comfortable to say that school should make teachers evaluate their performance by each other because students may vote the teacher they like rather than the teacher who teaches the best. Plus, by voting each other, teachers can imitate the best one and become better.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- Schools always collect information about teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who perform well. Which way do you think is more useful？ 1. to evaluate teachers' performance by students. 2. to evaluate teachers' performance by 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- TPO 41- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doi 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... can reflect the teaches performance. there are some people argue that school shoul...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...inion, I am in favor of second thought. the reasons I will explain below. First ...
^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...o find a teacher who is liked the most. if students vote a teacher they like, ther...
^^
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...important as well which can improve the teachers motivation, thus they can have more ene...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e more energy to mentor their students. however, the opinions given by students do not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...tudents do not have to be used to vote. since the teacher who gets the less number of...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ing, leading to the loss of talents. to sum up, due to above-mentioned reasons,...
^^
Line 10, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imitate the best one and become better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0697167756 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67880494568 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455337690632 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.6954295939 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.473684211 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1578947368 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84210526316 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320144255269 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106095513588 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659554900375 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176463872948 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469432435697 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.