The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how much water used three different sectors worldwide over 100 consecutive years from 1900 to 2000 measured in km3, and the table shows the amount of water consumed per person in two countries compared with population and irrigated land in 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that consumption of water rose in all sectors over the period, the most significant rose was in agriculture sector and it is worth to noting that Brazil used more water than Democratic Republic of Congo.
Consumption of water by Agriculture sector stood at about 500 km3 and rose significantly to reach about 3000 in 2000. Industrial and domestic usage began at fairly similar level at about 100 in 1900 then they both followed a similar trend until 1950. Between 1950 and 2000 industrial usage rose steadily to finish the period at about 1300 while domestic usage experienced a slight growth and in 2000 it accounted for below than 500.
With regards to consumption in Brazil and Congo, population in Brazil was 176 million and it had 26,500 km3 irrigated land, water usage constituted 359m3 per person. Democratic Republic of Congo by contrast had just 5.2 million population and a mere 100 km3 irrigated land, hence, each person used just 8m3.
- The two maps show the developments which small fishing village and surrounding area experienced over a period of 30 years between 1974 and 2004. 56
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extend do you agree? 56
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.To what extend do you agree? 56
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past.Why is this case?Is it positive or negative development? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'note'?
Suggestion: note
...n agriculture sector and it is worth to noting that Brazil used more water than Democr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evel at about 100 in 1900 then they both followed a similar trend until 1950. Bet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5694701537 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4305555173 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16487933948 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811089540563 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576349682106 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106644433972 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474271404878 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.