The graph and table below give information about water use worldwild and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the amount of water used worldwide for three different uses over a period of 100 years. And the table shows the population, the area of irrigated land and the water consumed individually in Brazil and Congo in the year 2000.
We can see that water in agriculture was the most between 1900 and 2000. In the second chart, it is clear that the water consumption of a Brazilian was far more than that of a person in Congo.
Over the 100-year period, the figures for three global water use increased a lot. In 1900, 500 kilotons of water was used in agriculture, while the other two uses only consumed a negligible amount of water. By 2000, the figure for agriculture had increased to 3000 kilotons. The total amount of water in industrial use and domestic use were 1100 kilotons and 300 kilotons respectively in 2000.
In the table, the population of Brazil was 176 million, which was far larger than Congo's population, which was only 5.2 million. And the area of irrigated land in Brazil was 26500 kilo square meters, while only 100 kilo square meters of land were irrigated in Congo. As for the water consumption by one person in 2000, each Brazilian could use 359 cube meters of water on average, whereas the equivalent figure for people in Congo was only eight.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68859649123 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46849570954 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0667104127 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1818181818 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164550265984 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790751068314 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562627441731 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119922183692 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423663611003 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.