The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007
The line graph above illustrates the use of margarine, low fat and reduced spreads, and butter in the years between 1981 and 2007. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, butter and margarine consumption declined/decreased over the given period. In contrast, low fat and reduced spreads, which were introduced in 1996, had an opposite trend.
In 1981, butter was the most popular spread, followed by butter. People consumed each just above 140 grams and about 90 grams, respectively. After peaking at 160 grams in 1986, consumption of butter plunged by 90 grams in 1996, then the decline was gradual to 50 grams in 2007. From 1981 to 2001, margarine consumption fluctuated between 80 and 100 grams, followed by a significant drop to 40 grams, by 2007.
People started to use low fat and reduced spreads since 1996. In the beginning, 10 grams were utilized, while in 2001, this number was eight times higher. By 2007, this figure saw a slight decrease of 10 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- With the rise of e-books comes to the decline in paper books. Some people see this as a good step forward while others do not. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 73
- In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper books. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 78
- The diagram of water cycle 78
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above illustrates the use of margarine,...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce 1996. In the beginning, 10 grams were utilized, while in 2001, this number was...
^^
Line 16, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure saw a slight decrease of 10 grams.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11042944785 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6997071756 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1176215859 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7272727273 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8181818182 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200418363396 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697639644871 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674142878297 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110415682269 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599149305219 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.