The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.

The line graph above illustrates the use of margarine, low fat and reduced spreads, and butter in the years between 1981 and 2007. Units are measured in grams.

Overall, butter and margarine consumption reduced over the given period. In contrast, low fat and reduced spreads which were introduced in 1996 had an opposite trend.

In 1981, butter was the most popular spread, followed by butter. People consumed each just above 140 grams and about 90 grams, respectively. After peaking of 160 grams in 1986, consumption of butter plunged by 90 grams in 1996, then the decline was gradual to 50 grams in 2007. From 1981 to 2001, margarine consumption fluctuated between 80 and 100 grams, followed by a significant drop to 40 grams, by 2007.

People started to use low fat and reduced spreads since 1996. In the beginning, its utilization was 10 grams, while, in 2001, this number was eight times higher. By 2007, this figure saw a slight decrease of 10 grams.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-11-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 hahoaan 73 view
Essays by user lusinelusine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above illustrates the use of margarine,...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure saw a slight decrease of 10 grams.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03658536585 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52368318129 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4938010794 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0909090909 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211963777973 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750380865252 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640455354733 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119981923489 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511098204674 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.