TPO 37- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest
The article speaks about one of the threate to turtle speciesthat lived in ocean and the possiblity of killing these animals by using nets. These nets are used for trapping shrimps. The passage suggests applying of a turtle excluder device (TED) for solving this problem and also provides three theories about the usefulness of these methods. The professor in the talk proposes that using TED method is a good way for preventing rurtle's death. So, the professor explains reasons for supporting TED method.
First, the reading asserts that the number of these turtles that trapped in nets are small and there is no need of using TED invention. However, the lecture rejects this idea by stating that the number of all the turtles that live in icean are very little in comparison with the number of shrimps. Also, the number of these turtles that trapped in nets is high. As a result the professor thinks using TED technique is a suitable way for keeping turtles alive.
Second, the text suggests that shortening the time that nets are under water is an effective solution. However the speech refures this method, too by explaining that there are a lot of boats and monitoring the time of fishing is not possible for government so, as you can see this method is useless. To solve this problem professor asserts that monitoring nets is a practical way. So, all boats just need to TED nets.
Third, the passage suggests that there are some big turtle in many areas and the regular TED nets are not suitable. However, the woman in the conversation has a different idea. She mentions that by replacing these TED nets with big TED nets this problem is solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-09 | pritam89 | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | PRACHI DAVE | 47 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 41 integrated writing 80
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 71
- Agree/Disagree: In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 60
- independent tpo 41 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ening the time that nets are under water is an effective solution. However the sp...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... under water is an effective solution. However the speech refures this method, too by ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75958188153 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37979349151 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477351916376 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6248249296 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.375 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16083585108 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641359069342 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049986241937 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105093736058 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313488124598 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.