TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task
The passage says that Venus is an inhospitable place for human presence. the text provide three reasons for supporting the idea. However, the talk refutes all these reasons by stating that people can live on this planet and provide three reasons.
First, the reading claims that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is greater than the pressure at Earth's surface. While the professor describes that there is a solution for solving this problem. He suggests that people can live in the floating stations between the surface and atmosphere. The talk describes that the pressure above the surfce of the planet is similar to the Earth's pressur.
Second, the text proposes that Venus's surface is lack of water. Also the planet's atmosphere does not have enough oxygen or water vapor which are essential for haman life. However the professor refutes this theory by describing that human can use chemical material like carbon dioxide and sulphuric acid for producing water. The professor adds this solution is a practical way for solve the water problem.
Third, the text states that the amount of sunlight reaches to the planet's surface is insufficient. However, the teacher describes that the thickness of the cloudes is not so much. Also, she startes that the amount of sunlight that prepares with reflection is enough for using solar power cells. As a result, she rejects the mentioned reason in the text.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Abbas.ghaffari | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | M.S 2019 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Mamalhastam | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | aaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | aaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 60
- TPO 29-Integrated writing 85
- TPO 36 integrated writing 3
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 68
- PO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... inhospitable place for human presence. the text provide three reasons for supporti...
^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s that Venuss surface is lack of water. Also the planets atmosphere does not have en...
^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...nuss surface is lack of water. Also the planets atmosphere does not have enough oxygen ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...por which are essential for haman life. However the professor refutes this theory by de...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the amount of sunlight reaches to the planets surface is insufficient. However...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08658008658 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41312385348 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5702952662 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3333333333 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241077516233 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078365267951 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635829438392 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138266028353 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045344198117 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.