Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
The benefits of technology have been always a matter of debate. With the advancement in technology, the relationship has taken a new dimension and has changed the way, people communicate with each other. These days, the relationship has become more fragile, mistrust and doubtful as compared to the earlier times. In my opinion, this development has been quite adverse which will be discussed in our paragraphs to follow.
To begin with, technology has made relationship quite suspicious. People are getting involved in relationship on social media like Facebook, Instagram even without knowing them personally. For example, there are cases where people who you are in contact through social media is actually fake and a fraud. He is just playing and making fools of you and you just believe that he is your friend and fall in love with him. Consequently, when you come to know the truth you realize that you have been deceived and the feeling is very painful. In other words, relationships are adversely affected by the advent of technology.
Furthermore, the connections between the people can be quite fragile and weak as compare to strength of relationship before the advent of technology. People without meeting each other and without knowing their strength and weakness tend to trust them and when they face each other the relationship breaks quite often. For instance, a recent survey conducted by a reputed body revealed that the percentage of divorce cases are high among the people who made their relationship through online social media. In short, the technology has brought many negative effects such as making weak and fragile relationships.
In conclusion, technology has altered the way people connect with each other and I believe it has more negative effects than it positive on relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | ashita | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | AYM Mostafa | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | chinmay011 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | rakeshsoni86 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | parinataneja | 67 | view |
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter•say where you think you left the papers•explain why they are so im 73
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference from someone who knew you when you were at college.In your letter:•say what job you have applied for•explain why you want this job•suggest what information the teacher should include 84
- More students are moving from developing countries to developed countries.Are rich countries stealing talented people from poorer countries? How can people be encouraged to stay in their home country? 73
- The success of a country is often determined by their economic power Is this the most important factor What other factors should be used to measure a country s success 42
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems do this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, furthermore, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2252559727 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83413347406 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9722762787 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363091133278 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118972749879 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102930284202 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239455872891 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719317722384 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.