THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED NUMBER OF VISITORS TO A NEW ART GALLERY FROM ITS OPENING DATE IN 1990 UP TO AND INCLUDING 2001. iT ALSO INDICATES THREE EVENTS IN THE GALLERY'S LIFE.
BELOW THE CHART, THERE ARE TWO PIE CHARTS WHICH SHOW THE SATISFACTION RATING OF VISITORS TO THE GALLERY IN 1990 AND 2001
The chart illustrates the original numbers and the estimated numbers people travelled to a new art gallery between 1990 and 2001 whereas two pie charts have data the amount of pleased rated by visitors to the gallery in this period.
Overall, the number of tourists had an upward trend in the real numbers while the estimated numbers saw a slight increase after fluctuating over the period in question.
From 1993 to 1994, there was a considerable decrease in the actual number of visitors came to the event of Shop opened, from 2000 to 1500. However, the estimated numbers saw slight growth, from 500 to 750. Besides, the actual people who were the most attracted by the Event of New Director Appointed peaked at 3000 in 1996. Meanwhile, there was a levelling off at the number of estimated tourists in this period.
We can see that the number of pleased tourists went up as twice times over the 11 years, from 30% to 70%. On the other hand, the number of people who were both dissatisfied and don't know saw a dramatic fall, between 1990 and 2001. From 40% to 20% with dissatisfied, from 30% to 10% with don't know.
It is clear from the graph that the actual number of people who visited the gallery exceeded expectation by a wide margin.
- the table below describe victim by age group offense categories in Venezuela 1999 56
- The percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited different attractions 11
- The chart below shows the changes that took places in three areas of crime in Newport City from 2003 to 2012. 78
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using an online dictionary in language class 76
- The graph below shows the student involvement in three sports in a school based on which grades they are studying in Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 w 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f people who were both dissatisfied and dont know saw a dramatic fall, between 1990 ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...with dissatisfied, from 30% to 10% with dont know. It is clear from the graph that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63800904977 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41727232714 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1321546293 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273269796467 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104299763916 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910046121564 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157829232861 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107574064201 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.