Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any doubt, technology has involved children like other people in the world. They tend to use technological devices for spending their time and doing their favorite activities. Definitely, some people if asked would agree with the statement that the technology made children less creative compare with the past while others have a negative attitude toward this issue. As I am concerned, I totally disagree with the opinion stated in the question. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on arguments to support my view.
The first point to be mentioned is that technology provides children the opportunity to have access to a lot of information with interesting themes and subjects that can improve their imagination in many areas and make them more creative. Let’s consider the following example to illustrate this point. For instance, a child that is talented in the painting by watching many videos on YouTube can get a lot of ideas about the different subjects and this influence his mindset and lead to create a painting that is different with other’s work. In fact, the technology gives him a chance to learn by watching videos while in the past, children can learn only in class under supervising a teacher and they can only be trained by some restricted resources.
The second reason that deserves some words is that with the advancement of technology, children could do some experiments in a safe condition, it is really attractive for the children who want to do some scientific experiments. For instance, many companies manufacture safe tools for children to have their own laboratory and test for example their favored chemical reaction and see the result of the chemical process in person. Or some of them might be interested in building their own favorite house so they can buy the materials that are considered children to make whatever they want. All of these improve their imagination, confidence, and innovation.
By the way of conclusion, base on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that technology assists children to be more creative and imaginative by providing them great variety program and video to learn from them and also making some implemental tools to create an atmosphere that children feel to experience whatever they want to test and build like real world by their imagining skills.
- TPO 45- independent writing task do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 73
- TPO16Q1 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 14 Q1 80
- Computers vs. traditional school 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e trained by some restricted resources. The second reason that deserves some wor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, really, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80916466209 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524547803618 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.9773707751 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.785714286 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241911161261 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083570388618 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590601783726 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151547218429 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938107416878 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.