Some people think that the museums and art galleries should concentrate on the history and art of their own country rather than the works of art of other parts of the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Historical and art exhibitions play a vital role in increasing the public’s comprehensive knowledge. However, whether museums and art galleries should focus on the local history and art or display the international works has caused heated debate. I agree that the local art and historical works can promote great patriotism but we should not ignore the importance of other countries’ art and history.
Promoting domestic art and historical works is crucial in nurturing patriotism. All kinds of local works represented in museums or art galleries recreate the chronological flow and cultural values of one nation, which can help the residents build the connection with their native cultures. Gaining knowledge from these works, thus, ensures the public’s love and pride for their country. For example, the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City has a series of rooms with military equipment and photographs depicting war crimes and the people’s sufferings, which enhance the audiences’ empathy and appreciation fore their motherland as well as the communities.
It is also true that the significance of international works should not be underestimated. The global historical art works allow the public to acquire proper understanding about different countries’ political and social issues as well as their distinct cultures, which is a crucial factor in fostering globalization. In fact, apart from French historical art works, the Louvre museum in Paris also exhibits an array of foreign works from European to Egyptian, which attracts millions of visitors all around the world each year coming here to peak their curiosity, broaden their horizons, and apparently supports the international relations.
In conclusion, local and international historical and art works are equally important. Beside the nation historical and art values, museum and galleries should also represent that of other countries, so that the public can enlarge their knowledge in both national and international history, political and social issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-23 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | WIWI UMAR | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Mai Linh | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-02 | manpreet kaurs | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | cuong.ielts | 89 | view |
- Social media badly impact our relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people use distance learning programmes study material post TV the Internet etc to study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefits of attending college or university To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 68
- Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their study in school. What are the reasons? How can we solve this problem 84
- People nowadays change careers and place of residence very often. Is it a positive or negatiive development 11
- The table below shows the percentage of main rypes of dwellinh in Victoria, the Northern Territory and Tasmania. Summarize the informationbby seleciting and reporting the main features and make comparison where revelant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 625, Rule ID: FORE_DPS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...udiences' empathy and appreciation fore their motherland as well as the communi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66019417476 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18731619235 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.7966164696 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.75 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314983506288 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13505454591 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747366186675 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21510244126 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662238250363 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.