Some people think that art ( such as painting and music) does not directly improve the quality of people's lives, so the government spends money on other areas. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, there is a proliferation consensus that the government and local authorities have been endeavoring to enhance the civic's life. Notwithstanding, this situation has sparked the firestorm whether numerous countries are squandering much money via some vain of art categories instead of investing in the infrastructure and economy. To the best of my knowledge, art does not solely contribute to the aesthetic precursor but also let our imagination run wide. I am biased towards the former opinion and the following essay will be analyzed in depth.
Initially, it is essential to recognize that the radical role of arts in state-of-the-art society is an invisible value, providing people to entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards, such as relief from stress. To be more specific, the masterpieces are just one of the soul seed, and also as a key component of culture and naturally passed down from one generation to another, especially it requires no money to survive. By way of illustration, when people constantly confined by under pressure in work or daily life, the most effective way to find some songs in which drive them to get lean and escape the hustle and bustle.
On the flip side, it is equally pivotal to distinguish the fact that public money of a city should be concentrated on a prospect like public facilities, which are more likely to bring immediate merits to the society rather than the arts. As a result of participating subject in several developing countries that build up a number of industrial products and integration with global's economy improvement plays a vital role rather than an expectation about the entertainment industry because of capacity to satisfy the needs of citizens and improve their high living standard.
Beyond any doubt, it is obvious that public facilities play a fundamental function about the well-being of individual civic. However, it is an inevitable and undistributed fact that the benefits of arts. I hope that the government will have rational fine-tune between material and spirit values in the long run.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- As major cities around the world are growing fast and many problems occur What are the problems that young people live in cities are caused by continued growth What solutions do you suggest 84
- Some people think that technology makes life complex and that we should make life simpler without using technologies To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some industrialized countries have serious environmental problems. The damage to the environment is an inevitable result when a country tends to improve the standard of living. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle. Both schools and parents are responsible for solving this problem. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial and spirit values in the long run.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18235294118 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08794956661 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8207645617 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.833333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123539906537 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365662495894 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294786908053 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622924715416 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037566800944 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.