As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it?
There is an increasingly ubiquitous belief that there are numerous obstacles Asian countries have to deal with. From my perspective, I believe poverty is the greatest challenge of all.
There are several reasons why this phenomenon has a devastating effect on numerous communities. Firstly, poverty results in the degradation of the education system essential to enhance personal development. Therefore, adolescents barely having opportunities to accumulate knowledge, which deters them from contributing to economic development. Secondly, public health services will be exacerbated if poverty is perpetuated. As the healthcare system is incapable of providing citizens with cures for detrimental diseases which pose a threat to the human race, the figure for the population will experience a dramatic decline, minimizing the number of up-and-coming young citizens who could make a huge contribution to the development of a region.
As a young and energetic generation, I am of the opinion that my peers and I have a vital role in the process of preventing poverty from continuously taking place. One thing we could do is making strenuous efforts to associate with international technical assistance. If developing nations achieve support regarding innovative technology in manufacture and other fields, a myriad of commodities will be produced in a short period. Thus, the unemployment rate will plummet significantly and there will be an increase in national income, paving the way for regional development. In order to implement the aforementioned method, the young generation should set their sight on taking their understanding further. Putting more effort into studying and participating in cultural exchange programs will be ideal choices for generation Z.
In conclusion, I believe young people should spend time accumulating knowledge and building relationships with friends living beyond their national boundaries to address poverty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-31 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 95 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 11 | view |
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 95
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop newmedicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that theseexperiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals tosuffer, while others are in favour of the 89
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places toentertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion 84
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a usefuleducational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having anadverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks ofvideo games outweigh the benefits? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79513888889 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30165612378 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2230736198 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109032611202 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328170743789 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279056967326 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692646134216 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241577341775 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.