Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What
can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
Nowadays, more and more human activities destroy the ecosystem. While there are some ways which governments can deal with this situation, people also can cut the burden for our environment.
There are several solutions that governments can make to discuss the damaging for the environment. The governments should enact the laws which aim to cut the amount of carbon dioxide emission, which are produced by daily human activities. For instance, over the last 100 years, concentration CO2 in the atmosphere increased dramatically by some sources such as vehicles, industrialization, and factories. Moreover, local authorities also have to propose the rule to limit the deforestation which is rising quickly in recent years. A quarter of acreage of forests in Vietnam, such as, dropped dramatically in just two years from 2012.
Besides, people also should support their governments to decrease the pressure on our ecosystem. Firstly, they can hold some education and propaganda campaigns to raise awareness for others. Through these activities, they should explain the role of forests, ozone layer to our lives and the effect of the CO2 not only to the atmosphere and fresh air but also the human respiratory system. Secondly, people can encourage the community to use reusable bags and recycle bottles instead of plastic and nylon which are building up not only on lands but also in oceans. For example, supermarkets in Vietnam are using bio-degeneration bags to carry goods for customers.
In conclusion, although authorities have to resolve the environmental problems, personal human also can help their governments to protect our ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | Sơn Joyous | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | nguyenminhchau372 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | hieu0998 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Tri H. Ho | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | Tri H. Ho | 61 | view |
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010. 89
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...matically in just two years from 2012. Besides, people also should support thei...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion bags to carry goods for customers. In conclusion, although authorities have...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4280155642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03714382402 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591439688716 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0090345599 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237954051948 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832990477621 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703060142804 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156890625546 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452554256674 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.