The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority
What we understand as a society is a collection of people where everyone is inter-connected and inter-dependent with each other. Hence, the well-being of society means the well-being of all the people of society. If the people of society don’t have any authoritative right to question the authority, there will be less possibility to progress the society in a balanced way. So, I strongly agree with the statement that the well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question the authority.
First of all, in this modern world, almost all the states are democratic states. In democratic states leaders are elected by the people of the society and leaders are bound to meet the needs of the people according to laws. That means people have authoritative power to question authority. If people don’t practice the authoritative power, gradually leaders will use the power for their own sake and become corrupted. For example, in Bangladesh, most of the people of our country are illiterate and they don’t know how to use their authoritative power and claim their constitutional demands. That’s why, most of the leaders of political parties are corrupted. Consequently, general public of the country suffer most.
Secondly, If the people don’t question the action of authority, leaders will control everything in their own accord. That means leaders will become dictators. As a result, people will become powerless element of the society and they have to maintain all commands given by the authority whether these are good for the people or not. For example, In Russia, people don’t have good government medical service and jobs for the young people but, Russian government spend huge portion of its budget in defense sector. It is because people of Russia are not allowed to question the authority for their action taken. As a result, people are suffering by losing their authoritative power.
Finally, It is never possible for an authority to take decision that will be one hundred percent perfect from all sides. In that case, people of the society can led the path to take the right decision in right time by questioning the authority. For example, in Bangladesh, recently people showed the rage against the government for not taking any strict action against smugglers. Later, government permit Rapid action battalion to take special mission against the smugglers which results in a lucid decrease in smuggling and drug dealing.
From the above analysis and examples, it is unambigous that the well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-05 | titanite09 | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 75 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | priyanshu1 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places 54
- Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should follow the example of the new Apex Theater in the mall outside of town When the Apex opened last year it 53
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 66
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individual 62
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 690, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...al parties are corrupted. Consequently, general public of the country suffer most. Second...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers which results in a lucid decrease in smuggling and drug dealing. From th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23820754717 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84771987728 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441037735849 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9567399271 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.954545455 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413905859632 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138448543807 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167198418934 0.0758088955206 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307804922651 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.211869906663 0.0667264976115 318% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.