Multinational companies are becoming increasingly common in developing countries.
What are the advantage and disadvantages of this?
Transnational corporations are opening more and more branches in the less industrialized nations. Whilst a higher rate of employment for local residents is the main merit of such a trend, difficulties local businesses are facing when competing with these business titans are the main drawback.
When a multinational firm establishes a new branch in one of the less developed states, this undoubtedly helps create lots of job opportunities for job seekers in these countries. This means less poverty, less unemployment and more support for national economies, which can lead to better social stability and citizens' overall satisfaction. According to a recent study conducted by Cairo University, 30% of Egyptian university graduates over the last 10 years have been hired by American industry giants operating in Egypt, such as Pepsi, Google, General Motors and General Electric. Therefore, the benefits of having these establishments working in poorer countries are obvious.
Despite the benefit of employment, national industries and local service providers find it virtually impossible to compete with multinational companies because they have huge advertising budgets, highly qualified employees, and close relationships with authorities. These characteristics make it extremely tough for small national brands to survive or to have any expansion plans when in competition with these mega-businesses. The Economist, for instance, has recently conducted a new research study revealing the fact that in Cairo for each new McDonald or KFC shop sets up, there are consequently 3 to 5 traditional Egyptian restaurants either completely shut down, or they are suffering severe financial issues.
Having presented the aforementioned merits and demerits for multinational companies, it can be concluded that although these overseas corporations benefit developing countries’ economies by providing many job opportunities, they can result in destroying or at least hindering the progress of some local competitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-23 | Abdelfatah | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Abdelfatah | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Abdelfatah | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Abdelfatah | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | Richa Dhiman | 84 | view |
- 3. Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual well-being.What are the factors that contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 89
- 9. Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest time of most people’s lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibility.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whateverthey like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to studysubjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related toscience and technology.Discuss both these views and 89
- some people argue that the government should help people who cannot afford to buy a house.do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a new research study revealing the fact that in Cairo for each new McDonald or K...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, at least, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87118644068 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33858553945 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654237288136 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0435486542 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.2 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0742289145774 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290032308934 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444110734321 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427273306268 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312552713942 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.36 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.