Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of
the subject being taught.
Almost everybody is able to remember special teachers from the past even if they are from their childhood. We probably can not remember the subject in detail that they taught us but we may remember the valuable advice and the way that they related to the class. Personally, I believe that the ability to get along with students is more important than just posses deep knowledge about an issue. I feel this way for the following two reasons.
Firstly, it is expected that you perform your job with expertise in all areas and all professions, it is the minimum requirement. Being the leading authority in the subject does not make a great professional netheir educator. The ability to communicate well and relate with others, however, will indicate the best teachers and other workers. For instance, an excellent doctor does not just have a lot of medical degrees but also should be kind and understanding their patients. Similarly, teachers should possess qualities and knowledge not just in academic view but they will inspire their students in life. Good values such as respect and commitment should be taught by them.
Secondly, the main function of educators is to detect the challenges of their students finding the right approach to help them to overcome it, just having knowledge is not sufficient. Teaching is to exchange wisdom, performing this requires specific skills, in other words, the professor should be committed, reasonable, creative, dedicated, organized and patient. Moreover, they should communicate, instruct and inspire through a confident relation. My own experience demonstrates this concept, when I was a student I thought that some of my teachers knew the subject but did not know how to transfer it. It is due to the inability to relate well with the students and understand their limitations. Furthermore, when educators perform an excellent job they obtain the respect of the class generating a pleasant environment. Consequently, the process of learning will be enhanced and considerable skills will be developed and improved in class.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that have a special relationship with their students is most important. This is because knowledge is a basic requirement for all professions and many others skills are necessary to generate a memorable teacher.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 70
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - altruist behavior 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, explaining how it cast doubt in the reading passage 3
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22849462366 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90117784199 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9881843572 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.368421053 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52631578947 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284279340961 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803445664024 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647032981851 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168619674122 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043833619813 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.