The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph show the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate.
The two pie charts provides data about the result of a survey of boys' and girls' cultural and leisure activities.
Overall, it is clearly shown that boys' are more likely into computer games than reading, while girls' are into dancing than listening to music.
To start with, boys' love computer games with more than a third of a fraction result than playing basketball which is only played by more than a quarter of boys'. Soccer is the third to the highest activity at 17% compared to skateboarding at 11%. Then, they prefer listening to music than reading at 10% and 2%, respectively.
Looking into the second chart, more than a quarter of girls are into dancing than playing computer games which is only played by more than a fifth of girls. In contrast to boys’, it is their most preferred leisure activity. Meanwhile, reading is the top two activity for girls at 21%, while netball is only played by less than fifth of girls followed by gymnastics at more than one in ten ratio. Although both gender has an equal proportion when listening to music, it is the least activity preferred by girls.
- The two pie charts illustrates the proportion of male and females in employment that are divided into six different field of occupations and are equally divided to manual and non-manual category in Great Britain in the year 1992. 73
- The bar chart below show how frequently the adolescents eat doughnuts in Texas. 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005 56
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 and 2007 73
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'ratio' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'ratios'.
Suggestion: ratios
...d by gymnastics at more than one in ten ratio. Although both gender has an equal prop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, then, third, while, in contrast, in contrast to, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72538860104 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44919380545 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512953367876 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8002000132 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114567063924 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626680547161 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596248743431 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999781397438 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743021849683 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.