In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first
being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement linking new significant contributions negatively with past achievements is
long debated upon. The prompt suggests that to make a noteworthy addition in
any field, one has to be strongly influenced by the work already done. In my opinion,
this statement is too extreme and I mostly disagree with it and argue that one can
always come up with a world-changing idea in a field which is untouched by humanity.
Internet is a place where one can easily establish oneself. But, to keep
constantly growing while maintaining strong roots is a challenging task and this cannot
be achieved without putting up a fight. For example, when Mark Zuckerberg created
Facebook it was not as big as it is today. But he kept on working hard on it to get it
where it is today. When Facebook was invented, the world had not seen anything of
that sort before. No one had ever created a space for anyone to come out and post
whatever they would like. Mark Zuckerberg had developed this idea all by himself
because nothing significant like Facebook was created before. This shows us that there
is no need to be surrounded by past achievements in order to free our brains and think
in a way that no-one ever has.
In contrast to the statement, we all know that 'Necessity is the Mother of
Inventions'. Consider how the need for something has always led to the emergence of
great ideas like the use of fire or the wheel. If people only made significant contributions
into fields that have already been aced by others we might not ever get new milestones
in those fields that lack past achievements. The field of Arts requires focus and
determination along with constant hard work. There are many artists who have come
up from the bottom and reached the skies only because of some novelty in their style
which is uninspired by others.
However, one might say that inspiration is a road if taken by anyone can lead to a palace
of new heights. This ideology can sometimes be true. For example, a sport like Soccer
has had outstanding players right from the start. And these players have motivated new
younger players to work hard to establish themselves as the new Lionel Messi or Pele or
Maradona. Sometimes past achievements do play a vital role in disclosing new
milestones the human brain or the human body can meet. As a result, the statement
can be considered to be true sometimes.
Hard work is such a tool which, if used with determination can overcome the limits set
by the world. The above statement can be considered as a fairly complex issue and
there is no one specific answer to it. People can always achieve anything in any field; be
it inspired from the past, or in a totally new one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | jonnybravo | 50 | view |
- People remember special gifts or presents that they have received. Why? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree/disagree with the following statement? Technology has made childrenless creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to supportyour answer. 73
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without firstbeing strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree withthe statement a 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that nospeaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be s 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 20, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...deas like the use of fire or the wheel. If people only made significant contributi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7714884696 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67012058272 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513626834382 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6109196736 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.04 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.08 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 34.0 4.97078651685 684% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164122152327 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448006852536 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530134774532 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424662213832 0.150359130593 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507162261929 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.