The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Social problems and emergencies have been excessively publicized on various social media for decades instead of providing positive developments. While its significant influence can benefit the public in several aspects, this essay agrees that their drawbacks can be more detrimental.
To begin with, the main benefit of approaching social problems and emergencies for people is to develop a sense of security and carefulness, which are essential when confronting to different situations. For instance, by watching criminal trials, people can heighten the awareness of different types of crime such as shoplifters or pickpockets and be more well-prepared towards strangers, who have suspicious activities. Furthermore, news reports are also responsible for delivering environmental issues and natural disasters such as droughts, floods or earthquakes, allowing people to protect themselves from financial loss and physical injuries as well as drawing governments’ attention to these phenomenons.
However, besides its positive influences, the drawbacks should be taken into consideration. First, excessively providing news related to crime or accidents could adversely affect people’s psychological state because they can experience various negative emotions such as anxiety, depression or insecurity. This is illustrated by the fact that those who frequently watch criminal programs are likely to have an unhappy life because they are afraid of being a victim in a crime. Second, this tendency encourages journalists to create bad stories and offer exaggerated news in an attempt to make a profit. Consequently, this has a negative impact on social harmony and stability.
In conclusion, although new reports related to problems and emergencies are being wide-spread to individuals and community, I argue that its negative impacts can be more harmful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-26 | Mr.Strange | 78 | view |
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- Many people disagree with the school about forcing children to learn new languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school Discuss both views and give your opinion 72
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others however believe that is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93703703704 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29277589791 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625925925926 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3926545804 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6363636364 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139357421846 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511129251456 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416277412134 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931350828727 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340773389213 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.