Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages?
Certain professionals argue that schoolchildren should launch to learn overseas languages at primary school as opposed to secondary school. I firmly agree with this statement of experts and I believe that merits of younger people learning languages outweigh drawbacks.
learning foreign languages at primary school has several benefits. Firstly, youth are more flexible, eager to be acquainted with unknown things compared to adolescents. Secondly, long-lasting learning and exercising assist to them have more self-confidence by speaking a foreign language. Thirdly, schoolchildren have the opportunity to participate in international programmes without any stress by speaking fluently a foreign language. For example, many teenagers from Lithuania attend projects and present presentations in a foreign language as they would be native speakers.
On the other hand, starting to learn other languages at primary school has some weaknesses. One of them would be that a school curriculum possesses a multitude of subjects, such as mathematics, history and chemistry, sometimes a schedule has been overcrowded. In other words, if teachers added other subjects to a timetable of children, schooling would be frustrating for youth and schoolchildren would suffer from stress leading to many mental diseases, namely depression or loneliness. Moreover, adolescents are more self-assured, well-educated persons and these inherent characteristics of teenagers has always allowed opting appropriately foreign languages, which they really have the willingness to study.
In conclusion, the benefits of learning a new language at primary school outweigh drawbacks. I completely perceive that it is meaningful to study a foreign language, while people are younger on account of the fact that it improves their communication skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Vikuns | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodations in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
...learning languages outweigh drawbacks. learning foreign languages at primary school has...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93155893536 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31364840108 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 283.868780488 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3799589447 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325226476887 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127435479125 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115266857318 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209207033451 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675660784473 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.4140731707 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 40.7170731707 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.