Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages?
In this modernized era, there are those who hold the belief that studying a foreign language should be adopted in the education program at primary school rather than secondary school. In my perspective, i myself strongly advocate this opinion because of the huge benefits that early language education brings about.
Regarding of the disadvantages that most people worry about this educational method, the language confusion is considered to be the first and foremost obstacle. In details, it is a fear of many parents that their children will be perplexed when learning both foreign languages and mother tongue at the same time in young age. These pupils are supposed not to speak their native language influently. Secondly, more additional subjects may make children bored with schoolwork. By doing this, they will lose the interest in campus and don't want to continue taking in them anymore.
On the other hand, the others highly support that the best time to pick up a language is in the primary school time. It was proved by scientists that the younger you are, the more efficiently you learn a new language. In secondary school, it may takes you more time to learn the same content of foreign language compared to primary school students. Moreover, being expert in a foreign language in a very young age may create more opportunities for you to take part in these fascinating events in foreign countries or simply spend more time on other complicated academic subjects.
In conclusion, it is clear that the positive side of the above - mentioned education method outweighs these own disadvantages. Thus, foreign languages should be taught in primary school in order to train our children in becoming the most skilled and talented generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-28 | Vikuns | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh | 73 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- These days many families move to other countries for work. Some people believe that the children in these families benefit from this move. However, others believe that it makes life more difficult for the children.Discuss both these views and give your ow 73
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
- nfluence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think it should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey will lose the interest in campus and dont want to continue taking in them anymore...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n other complicated academic subjects. In conclusion, it is clear that the posi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 5.60731707317 553% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12543554007 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69902022332 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592334494774 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2304189421 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.153846154 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334229403082 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110273844012 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963411288708 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193041073436 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552130820534 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.