E-book are and will always superior to paper book
E-book has become more popular over last decade, even threatening traditional paper book as a major book delivery channel. There is a compelling notion whether e-book replaces paper book has sparked a heated argument. In this essay I will elaborate both advantages and disadvantages of e-book and traditional paper book and close a logical conclusion at the end.
E-book provides an environment friendly and affordable reading option to readers. One of massive benefits of e-book is no paper involved during the production process, from writing, editing, printing delivery, the process is completely digitalized. A paperless world is important for delivery us from negative impact of deforestation and leading us to a sustainable world. Moreover, it also can cut the production cost of a book dramatically. Therefore, retail price of an e-book becomes more affordable than traditional paper book. As a result, it may improve number of illiteracy indirectly.
On the other hand, e-book requires a digital device. Digital device, which is suspicions a source of danger radiation, that is harmful to our body. A research study found that reading on a paper book helps our brain memory better than reading through digital device, and reader feels more relax.
In my conclusion, per our discussions mentioned above, I am inclined to prefer traditional paper back that provides all benefits from reading, without any psychological physical risks of our body.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Parents are responsible for their children’s behavior. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions. 77
- Parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done. What is your opinion? Support it with examples. 55
- This is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. Even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, may, moreover, so, therefore, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4298245614 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97541739069 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627192982456 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7918199295 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2307692308 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433700647451 0.242375264174 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167074221144 0.0925447433944 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133186402286 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243039830542 0.151781067708 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176721971551 0.0609392437508 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.