The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with the honest assessment.
To say that the talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations is not true in my opinion. There are many late great musicians now whose music and songs are still as popular as they were when they were alive. For example, Michael Jackson who is widely considered as the king of pop was laden with controversies both when he was alive and even after his death. Yet his compositions are still regarded as masterpieces by some and treated with disdain even when his fame is long gone with him. So even after his death his popularity is still split. There are many reasons why the fame of musicians or any other artists for that matter does not interfere with the assessment of their work.
Social media is one of the key reasons why even the most popular musicians of current generation sometimes have to face harsh critisism and backlash for media and the dans alike. Whenever any artist does anything, whether good or bad, their deed is posted by someone on the social media websites like Facebook or Twitter. So, if any popular musician carries out a gaffe it is immediately spread throughout the world through the means of social media. This has a huge impact on the musicians work.
Another important factor is that now a days ordinary people are the critics. Whenever a new song is launched anyone and everyone can listen to it on their phone. So, now they can immediately express their views on that particular song on the internet. These reviews on websites like Youtube and various social media websites can make or break the new album or song and the musician or the artist.
Regardless of how popular the musician is, their performance is no longer dependent on their fame but it depends on their work and how much effort they put into their work. So to say that an honest assessment is only possible posthumously is erroneous.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 54
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[5]
Message: “So even after” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en when his fame is long gone with him. So even after his death his popularity is still split. There are many reasons why the fame of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...rk. Another important factor is that now a days ordinary people are the critics. Whenev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... Another important factor is that now a days ordinary people are the critics. Whenev...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71044776119 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4504244703 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54328358209 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.143833197 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340813972102 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108182376888 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116591962486 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172526247986 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140027543103 0.0667264976115 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.