the table below shows the results of a 25-year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender.
The table gives information on bicycles’ use in terms of ages and sexes of Britain people over a period of 25 years.
Overall, it is noticeable that the distance of bicycles used by men was higher than the figure of women. Over the years, miles which were travelled by all cyclists had a decreasing trend.
It can be seen that teenagers’ male accounted for the highest of using bicycles of the period, while female children were the least of bicycles’ use. Women between 11 and 17 years old had a downward trend, from 56 miles in the first year to 22 miles in the last year, which was the similar trend of female adults.
In contrast, there was a slight upward trend of bicycles use of boys aged 18 to 59, which began at 72 miles and finished at 80 miles. Elderly people had a significant drop in the number of bicycles travelled by 16 miles over the years. Similarly, the distance travelled by bicycles of all cyclists went down to 38 miles at the end of the period.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 81
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 78
- Solar enegy is become more and more popular as a resource of household enery in many countries around the world. Why is that? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar enegy? 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50837988827 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63054349113 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7020598456 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214180227991 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986901997459 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823563819532 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152033386457 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855548615719 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.