The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries.
A glance at the figures reveals that Internet use in Europe exponentially grew in the period from 1995 to 2004. In addition, the UK was ranked first in the popularity of online shopping among the five countries listed.
As can be seen from the table, Internet was always most widely used by British people. More surprisingly, the quantity of Internet users in here was by far larger than that of the second most country - Germany, at 41 million compared with 15 million in 2004, respectively. Also, in the same year, there were a mere 6 million people using Internet in France, 4 million in Switzerland, and 2 million in Spain.
Specifically, the UK saw a steady increase in the number of Internet users from 16 million in 1995 to 22 million in 2000 before surging to a staggering 41 million in 2004. Likewise, Germany and France experienced a threefold climb respectively from 5 and 2 million in 1995 to 15 and 6 million in 2004. The other two countries, Switzerland and Spain even had a fourfold growth of Internet users after 10 years' time.
Proportion of online shopping in the UK, therefore, stood at the highest position among European countries. However, it is a paradox that Spain, which was ranked last in the total number of Internet users, had the second most online buyers in Europe. Meanwhile, there was moderate prevalence of online shopping in France, Germany and Switzerland.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 78
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries. 73
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 200.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, second, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86610878661 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78550002992 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55230125523 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4991245143 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.727272727 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204377291694 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853832392 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490921671577 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132912869948 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623014605435 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.