The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four
different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates the popularity of 4 different attractions to tourists who travel to England
Overall, it's clearly that Pier and Pavilion are the most favorite of all attractions in Brighton due to the increasing trend. Beside the promotion of Pier and Pavilion, Art Gallery with Festival are not really lucky while tourists didn't seem interested in these places
In the early stage, Pavilion and Pier didn't really well-known in Brighton with just only 25% for Pavilion, 10% for Pier in 1980. But some years later, visitors began to notice these places. Culminating in 1985 Pavilion officially surpassed Festival to reach the second place and got the highest number of 30% in 2010. Beside the development of Pavilion, Pier also concentrated a similar trend. In 2005, Art Gallery had the same destiny to Festival, gave way for Pier to reach the vertex of more than 20% in 2010
Art Gallery and Festival had more advantages in the first stage but there was no longer. The figures of Art Gallery had changed significantly from 37% in 1985 to 20% in 1990 and stopped at the lowest point about 10% in 2010. Festival seemed quite luckily than Art Gallery. At the end of the graph, Festival finally got 27% in 2010, only lower than Pavilion about 3%
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-06 | Phuongkhoa | 78 | view |
- The percentage of tourists to England who visited 4 different attractions in Brighton 56
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited fourdifferent attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in aEuropean country between 1979 and 2004. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...rists who travel to England Overall, its clearly that Pier and Pavilion are the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...val are not really lucky while tourists didnt seem interested in these places In t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... In the early stage, Pavilion and Pier didnt really well-known in Brighton with just...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, really, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84651162791 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52022645286 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558139534884 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.9093026066 43.030603864 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0692729670355 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307353237724 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517501616795 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760429020917 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755978943063 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.