The table illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by the US, EU, and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars between 2006 and 2010.
The table illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by the US, EU, and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, total aid increased rapidly in 5 years, and the US charities gave most of the money for donations.
From 2006 to 2010, the number of total aid rose significantly from $15,7 billion to $30 billion, raising $14,3 billion in the periods. During this time, US charities contribute grew steadily from $9.7 billion to reach a peak of $22.7 billion. Besides, the donation of remain charities also increased in the whole time.
In EU countries, there was a slowly grow in money aid each year from $3.3 billion (2006) to $3.8 billion (2008), followed by a slight fall in next year, before reaching to $4.0 billion in 2010. Moreover, contribution in other countries also rose although this figure had similar fluctuation as the number of EU charities in the amount of money given each year. Their donation went up from $2.7 billion to $3.3 billion at the end of the period.
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 56
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 76
- Today, humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies also increased in the whole time. In EU countries, there was a slowly grow...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 13.1623246493 8% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 1615.20841683 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74157303371 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61274009552 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6320786394 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476828278286 0.244688304435 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2251982649 0.084324248473 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.294830525989 0.0667982634062 441% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370448532746 0.151304729494 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.365467705133 0.056905535591 642% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.