The pie charts compare the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets,
namely an average diet, a healthy diet, and a healthy diet for sport.
The pie graphs below compare the percentages of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different types of diet.
Overall, it is clear that the more diets contain proportions of carbohydrates and the less the fat rates inside them, the healthier they are. The average diet meal contains the most protein’s rate and the least carbohydrates’ percentage.
The number of carbohydrates accounted for 40% in average meals. While this figure stays the same proportions of the fat and protein combine in the healthy diet, the rate of carbohydrates occupied two-thirds in the healthy diet for sportspeople.
The number of protein, in the average diet, accounted for the same figure of carbohydrates and double the rate of fat (20%). While protein’s percentage, in the healthy diet, lower 10% than this rate in the average diet, the fat’s proportion stay the same number. In the healthy diet for athletic, both protein and fat’s rate, which are 25% and 15% respectively, are cut back 5% compare with these figures in the healthy diet.
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealandand Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 78
- Many university students live with their families, while others live awayfrom home because their universities are in different places. What are theadvantages and disadvantages of both situations? 56
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 169.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27218934911 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17529370435 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 176.041082164 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9025428873 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49472134268 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.258683619435 0.084324248473 307% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114996542638 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342499785961 0.151304729494 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918078419405 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 78.4519038076 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.