A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A curriculum is a set of subjects that a student has to tackle throughout his or her educational life. Setting up a specific syllabus for the entire nation is, in my mind, not a brainy decision. Every part of a nation has its own culture, traditions and beliefs. Moreover, language is also different in the different parts of the nation. Based on these two points, my opinion is that the curriculum should not be the same across the whole nation.
Firstly, talking about the different traditions and cultures prevailing in the different parts of the same nation, it would be a daunting task to design a syllabus which encompasses the varieties in this respect. Teaching about the local traditions is also an integral part of the educational institutions. India, for example, is a country of multiple religions and faiths. In the north of India people follow completely different faith than the population of south India. So, having a national curriculum means to incorporate the different styles and cultures of the two halves of the country as well. Since the difference is so large, teaching both of them is quite impossible. Forcing them on students will yield no better result. Keeping this in mind an national syllabus is probably not a good idea.
Secondly, the language spoken across the same nation can also be different. Again, considering India as an example, to follow the same syllabus means to teach a common language. While the incumbent government did try to fix this issue, it was met with heavy criticism so the idea was dropped. With changing traditions, cultures and languages while travelling within the same nation, to have a national curriculum which appeals to every part of the country has a bleak chance.
In conclusion, keeping the above points in mind, it is really difficult to come up with a single idea or curriculum or syllabus which would appeal to every person in the nation. While some would argue that having a single curriculum would increase the harmony among the different states, forcing it on them would mean nothing but failure.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 54
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 30
- The main reason we should study history is to ensure that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past.Write a response in which you examine your own position on the statement. Explore the extent to which you either agree or disagree with it, and support you 16
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... no better result. Keeping this in mind an national syllabus is probably not a goo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95702005731 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71624170173 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498567335244 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5981396843 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0526315789 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1875387739 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619219475661 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050000373652 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12703834208 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374633783853 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.