The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate different use of energy and the amount of greenhouse gas emitted by Australian household. At first glance, it is clear that the proportion of water heating is by far the highest in discharging gas while the figure for cooling is always lowest in both energy use and gas emissions.
The percentage of Australian household energy use by water heating is 30%, while the figure for refrigeration is considerably lower, at 7%. At the same time, 15% of total energy use in Australia is by other appliances, whereas energy used by lighting and cooling account for only 4% and 2% respectively. Meanwhile, the rate of heating’s energy use stood at 42%, which is the highest figure.
The proportion of greenhouse gas emission by water heating is the highest, at 32%. Gas emitted by refrigeration made up for 14% of the total amount of households’ greenhouse gas, while the figure for other appliances is significantly higher, at 28%. In the same time, only 8% and 3% of greenhouse gas in this country was produced by lighting and cooling. By contrast, 15% was emitted by heating.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | sana_em | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services of IT support and current opening hours. 67
- Task 1: The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 73
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95721925134 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05236594452 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5241083871 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253184210482 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124211279175 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802142514084 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196249245084 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665485338901 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.