The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie charts illustrate the competition kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005. In general it can be seen that the highest one percentage was Coal, while the most negative trend was Others. The percentage of the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France maintained the same level in 1995 and 2005.
In the one hand in 1995, Coal got 29.80% which the highest category. Followed by gas was 29.63% was the second highest. Then, followed by Petro was 29.27%. After that, followed by Nuclear was 6.40%. The last followed by Others was 4.90%.
The other difference in 2005, Coal got 30.93% which the highest one. Followed by gas was 30,31% was the second highest. The third highest, followed by Petro was 19.55%. After that, followed by Nuclear was 10.10%. The last followed by Others was 9.10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 67
- The pie chart below sho the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 67
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages ? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85333333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29313952669 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1753305422 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 56.0 112.824112599 50% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5384615385 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105256212079 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588749503289 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128693654669 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113458193744 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150436906028 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.67 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.18 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.