The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995
The two pie charts show comparison about what European adults do when their free time between year 1985 and 1995. There are five activities during year 1985, while six activities during 1995 period include playing computer games as one of break activity.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that watching television provided most of the leisure activities in two periods. There was 32 percent of adult people watching television as their break activity in 1985, and in 1995 at 30 percent. Therefore, talking with family activity was the lowest leisure activities by adult people in both periods, accounted at 18 percent in 1985 and at 7 percent in 1995.
Only in 1995, playing computer games was the one of leisure activity because computer was not the primary need in 1985. It took the second of majority leisure activity after watching television, accounted for just 27 percent.
Finally, it can said that in the period 1985 and 1995, individual activities such watching television or playing computer games, was more than socialisation activities such talking with friends and family
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 92 | view |
- Effects of Internet 61
- With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USAbetween 1920 and 2000. 56
- The internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive 56
- Leisure Activities of Europian Adults 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two different pie charts that tells abo...
^^^
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... charts that tells about the outcome of a examination about the enthusiasm of rec...
^
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'watch'?
Suggestion: watch
.... In 1985, adults in Europe prefer to watching tv rather than another recreation activ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nd eating out become more unpopular for all of the adults and only have less than ten perc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve less than ten percent from the share,
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09356725146 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43922047355 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654970760234 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9504485345 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141395590517 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565756945765 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684455456254 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987337442863 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689360376574 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.